Teaching Staff

Sexenniums – Results – Previous Calls

2020 Call

Regarding 2020 call for the evaluation of the research activities of the teaching staff under contract with UPV/EHU (Resolution of 22nd December 2020) these are the results rendered:

Evaluation was requested by 326 people, requiring evaluation for 369 sexennia.
Of these 326 people who requested evaluation, 155 did not meet the legal requirements established in the call.
Of these 326 people who requested evaluation 171 met the requirements and go to the CNEAI evaluation process.
CNEAI evaluated 171 applications for evaluation and 191 sexennia.

The results of the evaluation process are:

Positive evaluations: 174 sexennia.
Negative evaluations: 17 sexennia.

8 Assessment requests to be resolved in administrative proceedings.

2019 Call

Regarding 2019 call for the evaluation of the research activities of the teaching staff under contract with UPV/EHU (Resolution of 10th December 2019) these are the results rendered:

Evaluation was requested by 222 people, requiring evaluation for 237 sexennia.
Of these 222 people who requested evaluation, 29 did not meet the legal requirements established in the call.
Of these 222 people who requested evaluation 193 met the requirements and go to the CNEAI evaluation process.
CNEAI evaluated 193 applications for evaluation and 210 sexennia.

The results of the evaluation process are:

Positive evaluations: 199 sexennia.
Negative evaluations: 11 sexennia.An Evaluation to be resolved.

2018 Call

Regarding the 2018 Call for Evaluation of the research activity of teachers with a permanent employment contract from the UPV/EHU (Full Professor, Aggregate, permanent Consultant and permanent researchers). (Resolution of 10th December 2018). The updated data is as follows:

Evaluation was requested by 173 people, requiring evaluation for 183 sexennia.
Of these 173 people who requested evaluation, 30 did not meet the legal requirements established in the call.
Of these 173 people who requested evaluation 143 met the requirements and passed the CNEAI evaluation process.
CNEAI evaluated 143 applications for evaluation and 149 sexennia.

The results of the evaluation process are:

Positive evaluations: 134 sexennia.
Negative evaluations: 15 sexennia.

Regarding the pilot process for the evaluation of the transfer of knowledge and innovation of teachers under employment contract of the UPV/EHU (Resolution 10th December 2018), the results obtained are the following:

131 people requested the evaluation, requesting the evaluation of a transfer tranche each.
Of these 131 people who requested evaluation, 15 people did not meet the legal requirements established in the call.
Of these 131 people, 166 met the requirements and passed the CNEAI evaluation process.
CNEAI evaluated 115 applications for evaluation.

The results of the evaluation process are:

Positive evaluations: 38 sexennia
Negative evaluations: 77 sexennia.
An evaluation to be resolved.

2017 Call

Regarding 2017 call for the evaluation of the research activities of the teaching staff under contract with UPV/EHU (Resolution of 24th January 2018) these are the results rendered:

Evaluation was requested by 156 people, requiring evaluation for 173 sexennia.
Of these 156 people who requested evaluation, 20 did not meet the legal requirements established in the call.
Of these 156 people who requested evaluation 136 met the requirements and go to the CNEAI evaluation process.
CNEAI evaluated 136 applications for evaluation and 156 sexennia.

The results of the evaluation process are:

Positive evaluations: 140 sexennia.
Negative evaluations: 15 sexennia.

1 Evaluation requests to be resolved in administrative proceedings.

2016 Call

Regarding the 2016 Call for Evaluation of the research activity of teachers with a permanent employment contract from the UPV/EHU (Full Professor, Aggregate, permanent Consultant and permanent researchers). (Resolution of 30th of November 2016). The updated data is as follows:

Cadidates presented to VI call: 100 teachers.
Of the 100 teachers, 110 sexennia were requested.
Of the 110 sexennia 100 were favourable.
Of the 110 sexennia 10 were unfavourable.

2015 Call

Regarding the 2015 Call for Evaluation of the research activity of teachers with a permanent employment contract from the UPV/EHU (Full Professor, Aggregate, permanent Consultant and permanent researchers). (Resolution of 30th of November 2015). The updated data is as follows:

Candidates presented to VI call: 74 teachers.
Of the 74 teachers 2 were declined.
Of the 72 remaining teachers, 76 sexennia were requested.
Of the 76 sexennia 69 were favourable.
Of the 76 sexennia 7 were unfavourable.
5 appeals were presented.
Of the 5 appeals 3 were upheld.
Of the 5 appeals 2 were not upheld.

2014 Call

Regarding the 2014 Call for Evaluation of the research activity of teachers with a permanent employment contract from the UPV/EHU (Full Professor, Aggregate, permanent Consultant and permanent researchers). (Resolution of 4th of December 2014). The updated data is as follows:

Candidates presented to V call: 82 teachers.
Of the 82 teachers 1 was declined.
Of the 81 remaining teachers, 85 sexennia were requested.
Of the 85 sexennia 68 were favourable.
Of the 85 sexennia 17 were unfavourable.
10 Appeals were presented.
Of the 10 appeals 5 were upheld.
Of the 10 appeals 5 were not upheld.

2013 Call

Regarding the 2013 Call for Evaluation of the research activity of teachers with a permanent employment contract from the UPV/EHU (Full Professor, Aggregate, permanent Consultant and permanent researchers). (Resolution of 21st of November 2013). The updated data is as follows:

Candidates presented to IV call: 113 teachers.
Of the 113 teachers 1 was declined.
Of the 112 remaining teachers, 130 sexennia were requested.
Of the 130 sexennia 107 were favourable.
Of the 130 sexennia 23 were unfavourable.
11 Appeals were presented.
Of the 11 appeals 5 were upheld.
Of the 11 appeals 6 were not upheld.

2012 Call

Regarding the 2012 Call for Evaluation of the research activity of teachers with a permanent employment contract from the UPV/EHU (Full Professor, Aggregate, permanent Consultant and permanent researchers). (Resolution of 29th of November 2012). The updated data is as follows:

Candidates presented to III call: 130 teachers.
Of the 130 teachers 6 were declined.
Of the 124 remaining teachers, 149 sexennia were requested.
Of the 149 sexennia 112 were favourable.
Of the 149 sexennia 37 were unfavourable.
21 Appeals were presented.
Of the 21 appeals 7 were upheld.
Of the 21 appeals 14 were not upheld.

2011 Call

Regarding the 2011 Call for Evaluation of the research activity of teachers with a permanent employment contract from the UPV/EHU (Full Professor, Aggregate, permanent Consultant and permanent researchers). (Resolution of 30th of November 2011). The updated data is as follows:

Candidates presented to II call: 157 teachers.
Of the 157 teachers 3 were declined.
Of the 154 remaining teachers, 211 sexennia were requested.
Of the 211 sexennia 179 were favourable.
Of the 211 sexennia 32 were unfavourable.
26 Appeals were presented.
Of the 26 appeals 9 were upheld.
Of the 26 appeals 17 were not upheld.

2010 Call

Regarding the 2010 Call for Evaluation of the research activity of teachers with a permanent employment contract from the UPV/EHU (Full Professor, Aggregate, permanent Consultant and permanent researchers). (Resolution of 10th of November 2010).

The updated data is as follows:

Candidates presented to I call: 151 teachers.
Of the 151 teachers 8 were declined.
Of the 143 remaining teachers, 206 sexennia were requested.
Of the 206 sexennia 144 were favourable.
Of the 206 sexennia 62 were unfavourable.
33 Appeals were presented.
Of the 33 appeals 9 were upheld.
Of the 33 appeals 24 were not upheld.

< back

		Unibasq is a full member of the European Consortium for Accreditation
		Unibasq is a full member of the European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education
		Unibasq is listed in the European Quality Assurance Register for Higher Education
		Unibasq is a full member of the International Network for Quality Assurance Agencies in Higher Education